It works in context.
The agent uses the current tab, its live state, and the human-facing website—not a disconnected copy of the product.
Agent access engineering for existing websites
Entruic turns the workflows your website already carries into structured, permissioned actions for AI agents.
Use the live browser when context matters. Use API or MCP when system access is stronger. Verify the business outcome either way.
Contact usFor people
For agents · WebMCP
WebMCP lets an open page expose a named action to an agent: its inputs, permission boundary, and expected result. The action stays attached to the current browser tab. It is an emerging browser standard, used where live page context and user control matter—not as a replacement for every system.
The agent uses the current tab, its live state, and the human-facing website—not a disconnected copy of the product.
Instead of inferring buttons and fields, the agent sees a named action with defined parameters and a structured result.
WebMCP is for browser workflows. APIs or MCP support actions that belong in the backend or must run outside a tab.
Agent access is worth engineering when the work depends on live context, real business rules, and a result that can be checked.
Search, eligibility, matching, availability, and quoting—where a useful answer depends on live business context.
Enquiries, bookings, applications, and support triage—where intent has to reach the right team or system without being distorted.
Checkout, account changes, submissions, and confirmations—where permissions, approval, and an auditable outcome matter.
Every engagement begins with the workflow, its permissions, and the business state that matters—before a protocol or a tool is chosen.
Workflow map + success condition.
We map customer intent, the system of record, business rules, approvals, and the state that proves the work is complete.
A testable agent interface.
WebMCP is used where browser context matters; APIs or MCP are used where the backend is the stronger surface. The agent gets one clear path.
Evidence for a safe release.
We exercise failure paths and confirm the authoritative business state—not just an agent reply—before the workflow is treated as dependable.
In a native WebMCP commerce benchmark, both conditions used the same tools and backend. Only procedure, recovery, and outcome verification changed.
verified completion
20% → 100%
failure scenarios recovered
Inventory, price, lost response & compound fault
business invariants passed
On the compound-failure checkout
50 deterministic native WebMCP runs in Chrome 151; 25 runs per condition across five checkout scenarios. This is reproducible technical evidence, not customer production performance.
For a workflow review, a technical question, or a partnership, write to Henry directly. Start with the work as it happens today and what must never go wrong.